Re: Boost vs. Open Space

From: Lois Goldthwaite (loisg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-14 06:30:31

Um, did you really mean Open Space, or might it have been Objectspace?
If the latter, yes, I especially would be interested. The point of
Standards is that implementations are supposed to be interchangeable. 

Your friend is a wise person. Listen to him.  :-)

Lois
(maintainer of guess what library)

> Message: 21
>    Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:52:42 -0800
>    From: Phlip <pplumlee_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Boost vs. Open Space
> 
> Boosters
> 
> I have this friend who's into the Open Space STL & Extensions library.
> 
> I like Boost.
> 
> In a nutshell, ballpark estimate, will me and my friend ever get along?
> 
> The first sign of trouble comes when my friend applies Boost Python 
> Library to an object he's creating, but he replaces the STL headers with 
> ospace STL headers. Then some dumb line deep in Boost crashes. I'l report 
> the line if y'all are curious, but, like I said, I'm only after a 
> high-level view for now.
> 
> -- 
>   Phlip                          phlip_cpp_at_[hidden]
> ============ http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PhlIp ============
>   --  Proud victim of the dreaded boomerang effect  --
> 
>