From: Lois Goldthwaite (loisg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-14 06:30:31
Um, did you really mean Open Space, or might it have been Objectspace?
If the latter, yes, I especially would be interested. The point of
Standards is that implementations are supposed to be interchangeable.
Your friend is a wise person. Listen to him. :-)
(maintainer of guess what library)
> Message: 21
> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:52:42 -0800
> From: Phlip <pplumlee_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Boost vs. Open Space
> I have this friend who's into the Open Space STL & Extensions library.
> I like Boost.
> In a nutshell, ballpark estimate, will me and my friend ever get along?
> The first sign of trouble comes when my friend applies Boost Python
> Library to an object he's creating, but he replaces the STL headers with
> ospace STL headers. Then some dumb line deep in Boost crashes. I'l report
> the line if y'all are curious, but, like I said, I'm only after a
> high-level view for now.
> Phlip phlip_cpp_at_[hidden]
> ============ http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?PhlIp ============
> -- Proud victim of the dreaded boomerang effect --
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk