Boost logo

Boost :

From: jeff_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-02-15 21:24:07

> >I would like to point out that the full is already
>2 MB
> >compressed (500 KB of which are JPEGs of developers) and the Info-
> >stuff adds another 200 KB compressed.
> >
> >Compare that to the full Linux 2.0.30 kernel, which is only 6 MB.

As much as I enjoy them, it sounds like the developer pictures should
be eliminated.

> So what's the solution? We really don't want to reinvent the wheel.

Well, I hate to change my mind on this issue, but while looking at
the zlib page I realized there are binary libraries available for
windows and other platforms. Thus since we were already headed to
the idea of reusing it without modification, I am thinking we
shouldn't bundle source since binaries/sources are so readily
available. As was pointed out earlier it is also trivial to build.

> For the compression section, there would be one additional link
> explanation of why) that downloads the zlib distribution from their
> site.

Yep. Makes sense.

> Presumably part of the formal review for any library that depends
on a
> non-Boost library would include pros and cons of the dependency.
> there is a protection against a detrimental dependency on a non-
> library, but a mechanism to avoid reinventing the wheel if linking
> another library really is the smart thing to do.

Makes sense to me. It is clearly a judgment which needs to be
evaluated on a case by case basis. Perhaps the policy should be
updated to say something like: Use of external libraries is generally
discouraged. However, given compatible licensing policies, broad
availability, and demonstration of needless reinvention of stable
code exceptions can be made.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at