Re: std::binder1st and transform_iterator (was Re: [boost] iterator adaptors & concept checks)

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-29 14:41:30

On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David Abrahams wrote:
abraha> Or, perhaps the requirement of default-constructibility does. Consider a new
abraha> dimension of granularity for your iterator category refinement!

Hmm, I think it would be pretty bad to have iterators that are not defualt
constructible. For example, you couldn't use tie() to intialize a pair of
them... shoot, putting iterators in std::pair at all would become
problematic.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                        www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Candidate                  email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Univ. of Notre Dame         work phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------