Re: [boost] Named template parameters

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-05 17:00:59

So this is what iterator traits would look like:

template <class Base, class Policies,
  class Traits = boost::detail::iterator_traits<Base> >
struct iterator_adaptor;

Then the iterator_traits_builder could be used (or not) for the Traits
argument.

So you could leave off the Traits completely if the default is OK. Is this
what you mean by the terse usage?

I suppose the rest of the generators would switch back to taking a traits
class instead of the individual types.

Cheers,
Jeremy

On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, David Abrahams wrote:

abraha> 
abraha> ----- Original Message -----
abraha> From: "Jeremy Siek" <jsiek_at_[hidden]>
abraha> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
abraha> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:03 PM
abraha> Subject: Re: [boost] Named template parameters
abraha> 
abraha> 
abraha> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, David Abrahams wrote:
abraha> > abraha> Likewise; I don't have a preference... Alexy's got a point here,
abraha> and since
abraha> > abraha> he's an originator of the technique, maybe we should defer to him.
abraha> >
abraha> > Sure. Shall I go ahead and dive in to changing iterator_adaptors.hpp?
abraha> 
abraha> If you've figured out how to preserve the non-named
abraha> (terse) usage, then OK.
abraha> 
abraha> 
abraha>  
abraha> 
abraha> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
abraha> 
abraha> 
abraha> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                        www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Candidate                  email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Univ. of Notre Dame         work phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------