Boost logo

Boost :

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-12 08:46:58

From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>

> Why would anyone want to make this change? I introduced the macro, but
> was precedent for it in Alexey's work. It was well-considered as written,
> far as I can tell. Why mess with it?

Consistency, I suppose. Macro arguments are traditionally separated with a
comma. Why introduce another "convention" on a case by case basis?

Not that it matters, of course. This is an implementation detail. Users
aren't supposed to use (or even see) the macro... or are they?

Peter Dimov
Multi Media Ltd.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at