From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-12 08:46:58
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> Why would anyone want to make this change? I introduced the macro, but
> was precedent for it in Alexey's work. It was well-considered as written,
> far as I can tell. Why mess with it?
Consistency, I suppose. Macro arguments are traditionally separated with a
comma. Why introduce another "convention" on a case by case basis?
Not that it matters, of course. This is an implementation detail. Users
aren't supposed to use (or even see) the macro... or are they?
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk