Re: [boost] Re: matrix library ?

From: Dave Steffen (steffend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-12 20:59:22

David Abrahams writes:
 > Check. Regarding the inner-/outer- product issue, I recall seeing a post
 > somewhere about simulating new operators (e.g. exponentiation) with a
 > notation like this:
 > 
 > A *exp* B
 > 
 > It's not crazy to imagine *inner* and *outer*. Of course we might need to
 > use 2 separate namespaces for the different defaults of plain operator* ;-(.

 Right, yes, absolutely.  Or, maybe, template parameters? Hmm...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave Steffen                      Wave after wave will flow with the tide
Dept. of Physics                    And bury the world as it does
Colorado State University         Tide after tide will flow and recede
steffend_at_[hidden]        Leaving life to go on as it was...
                                                        - Peart / RUSH
"The reason that our people suffer in this way.... 
is that our ancestors failed to rule wisely".   -General Choi, Hong Hi