From: Roland Weiss (weissr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-13 04:34:47
> > > Looks like it has potential. Has anyone used it?
> > I ran some files through it. Looks good in general and may be used
> > for documentation purposes, but some language constructs,
> > especially templates, still have lots of unimplemented features.
> I'm confused by this.
> What does it mean for templates to "have unimplemented features"?
> We are basically just talking about a parser here... right?
All components of gcc's internal parse tree have to be mapped to some
XML construct (element, attribute). This was not the case with this
tool when I looked at it a month ago.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk