Date: 2001-03-15 10:22:34
--- In boost_at_y..., Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis_at_c...> wrote:
> jerome_lecomte_at_c... writes:
> | The work already done on LAPACK is also huge. I mean HUGE: we're
> | talking of 10 years of work; and the library is actually quite
> | designed once you get familiar with their cryptic naming scheme.
> Not just because it is huge and took 10 years to accomplish means we
> should lock C++ users in that direction. The work was certainly
> the language used wasn't innocent.
> -- Gaby
I agree, I meant to say we should not discard lapack and provide some
compatility with it, at least until an exp-template-based library can
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk