Re: Matrix

From: jlecomte1972_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-03-15 10:22:34

--- In boost_at_y..., Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel.Dos-Reis_at_c...> wrote:
> jerome_lecomte_at_c... writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> | The work already done on LAPACK is also huge. I mean HUGE: we're 
> | talking of 10 years of work; and the library is actually quite 
well 
> | designed once you get familiar with their cryptic naming scheme.
> 
> Not just because it is huge and took 10 years to accomplish means we
> should lock C++ users in that direction.  The work was certainly 
hard;
> the language used wasn't innocent.
> 
> -- Gaby

I agree, I meant to say we should not discard lapack and provide some 
compatility with it, at least until an exp-template-based library can 
be substituted.

Jerome