From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-03-20 15:28:47
At 03:09 PM 3/20/2001, nbecker_at_[hidden] wrote:
>A number of unit test efforts appear to derive from junit. cppunit is
>one. It looks to me that this may be OK for testing classes, but in
>C++ not everything is a class. I also need to test plain old
>functions. I'm really looking for something very lightweight and
>flexible, and not necessarily limited to classes.
The "lightweight and flexible" layer is supposed to be handled by the
current Boost.Test components. See
The issue Thomas was asking about is the open slot for a unit test tool.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk