From: Toon Knapen (toon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-02 13:18:22
Jeremy Siek wrote:
> sbarra> But if my assumption above is correct, I don't understand how the result of
> sbarra> indirect slicing and the result of slicing with Range objects can be of the
> sbarra> same type, since these are two different kind of views.
> I don't either ;) They will need to be different types. I haven't figured
> out how to express the different types yet (in terms of the interface
> presented to the user).
Would the interface of an indirect subarray not be identical to a
strided subarray ?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk