From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-03 07:18:32
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Matthew Austern" <austern_at_[hidden]>
> > > As with string, the needs and wants of mutex users vary a great deal.
> > > we don't have a generative system, we can't meet these varied needs.
> > I don't agree with that last sentence. If you need more than one class,
> > it does not follow that the only solution is to have a generative
> > Maybe the right solution is just to have more than one class.
> We could avoid the problem using a layered approach: if you have all the
> classes, sticking a generative interface on top is simple.
Generative programming does not mean "stick a generative interface on top."
If you have all the classes, a generative interface is simply not necessary.
Generative programming, if I understand it correctly, means "look at several
concrete examples of the solution space, separate the orthogonal features,
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk