Boost logo

Boost :

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-03 11:33:44

Hi Bill,

Ok, so what I get from what you are saying is that try-locking also needs
to be treated orthogonally.

Here's one question. Is there anything to be gained by bundling the
different locking mechanisms (basic, try, timed) into a single mutex
class. Would it be simpler to have separate mutex classes for each?

Bill, perhaps you could post a revision of the table below showing
what you envision?

About the unchecked semantics... I'm not sure why you have
both "unchecked" and "unspecified". Why not just have "unspecified"?


 Jeremy Siek www:
 Ph.D. Candidate email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Univ. of Notre Dame work phone: (219) 631-3906

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at