Re: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?

From: Rainer Deyke (root_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-03 14:13:33

----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?

> At 10:20 AM 4/3/2001, Rainer Deyke wrote:
>  >// C.hpp
>  >class Cimpl;
>  >class C {
>  >public:
>  >  ~C();
>  >private:
>  >  boost::scoped_ptr<Cimpl> impl;
>  >};
>  >
>  >// C.cpp
>  >class Cimpl {
>  >};
>  >
>  >C::~C()
>  >{
>  >}
>  >
>  >Am I missing something, or are you talking about a different idiom?
>
> That is the idiom I was talking about.

Then there shouldn't be a problem.  Declaring '~C' in 'C' and placing the
definition for 'C::~C' below the definition for 'Cimpl' causes 'Cimpl' to be
a complete type at the point where 'scoped_ptr<Cimpl>::~scoped_ptr' is
called.  'Cimpl' doesn't even need a trivial destructor.

--
Rainer Deyke (root_at_[hidden])
Shareware computer games           -           http://rainerdeyke.com
"In ihren Reihen zu stehen heisst unter Feinden zu kaempfen" - Abigor