Fw: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?

From: Arun Sivaramakrishnan (aruns_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-04 10:50:36

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arun Sivaramakrishnan" <aruns_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?

>     To compile C.cpp ,yes we dont need CImpl

I meant to say :the destructor of CImpl

>to be trivial ,but in other translation units
> where the C.h is included and C -objects might be used ,CImpl and its
> destructor would'nt be visible then,would it? So to use the idiom we do
need
> CImpl

same here :the destructor of CImpl

>to be trivial ,dont we?.I guess this puts me back to where we started.
> Somebody please clarify!
>