From: Arun Sivaramakrishnan (aruns_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-04 10:50:36
----- Original Message -----
From: "Arun Sivaramakrishnan" <aruns_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Re: scoped_ptr: trivial dtor?
> To compile C.cpp ,yes we dont need CImpl
I meant to say :the destructor of CImpl
>to be trivial ,but in other translation units
> where the C.h is included and C -objects might be used ,CImpl and its
> destructor would'nt be visible then,would it? So to use the idiom we do
same here :the destructor of CImpl
>to be trivial ,dont we?.I guess this puts me back to where we started.
> Somebody please clarify!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk