Re: Is there plans to make stand-alone functor traits?

From: kevin_vanhorn_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-04-04 17:01:46

--- In boost_at_y..., jk_at_s... wrote:
> There are cases when unified function object traits would be
> useful, when writing template class with functor as template
> parameters.

I wrote a replacement for <functional> several years ago that worked
for function pointers as well, and allowed one to distinguish the
unadorned argument or return type (e.g., foo) from the full argument
or return type (e.g., foo &, foo const &, or foo).  If there's any
interest, I can dig it up and post it to the list.