Re: Is there plans to make stand-alone functor traits?

From: kevin_vanhorn_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-04-05 09:00:14

--- In boost_at_y..., "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_m...> wrote:
> > I wrote a replacement for <functional> several years ago that
> > worked for function pointers as well, and allowed one to
> > distinguish the unadorned argument or return type (e.g., foo)
> > from the full argument or return type (e.g., foo &, foo const &,
> > or foo).  If there's any interest, I can dig it up and post it
> > to the list.
> 
> Yes! I always been frustrated by having to remember the
> AdaptableUnaryFunction distinction, [...]

OK, I've unpacked it and put it on the web at
http://www.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu/~kvanhorn/old_stuff/code/fct_objs.html.
This code is 3-1/2 years old (August '97) and I haven't done much with
it since I wrote it, so it probably needs at least a little reworking
before it's ready for prime time.