From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-05 09:14:10
At 08:33 AM 4/5/2001, John Maddock wrote:
>BTW how about :
>which would have the effect you want I think...
I'll test that.
I want to think about the change for a few days, too. There is a down
* The change will break some user code.
* Destructors become slightly slower.
* Safety is improved.
* If the documentation clearly shows how to make non-trivial destructors
work for opaque (ie, incomplete) implementation classes, that is in effect
a functionality improvement since the idiom is unfamiliar to many
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk