From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-10 05:11:40
From: "Geurt Vos" <G.Vos_at_[hidden]>
> I've been studying the code of any_function a bit, and came to
> the conclusion that at least the goals are like, quite different.
> For instance:
> * it's not really type-strict. My implementation is.
> * the implementation is particularly optimized for speed.
> Mine for simplicity and extendibility. (I actually never
> intended to use it as e.g. predicate to std algorithms)
Let's not focus on implementation details, please. The interface is
FWIW, I have my own implementation, too, but I'm more than willing to accept
Doug's version, _if_ it meets the interface requirements we set.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk