From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-11 10:13:50
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> I tend to agree with Jesse here. If somebody wants the throwing behavior
> (s)he can always add it atop the other one.
"If somebody wants the throwing behavior from 'new' (s)he can always add it
atop the other one." :-)
> If not, there is no recourse.
Why would you want a recourse? The undefined behavior doesn't buy you
anything. If you never call an empty function, you'll never get an
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk