Boost logo

Boost :

From: Lois Goldthwaite (loisg_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-16 08:35:51


> --- In boost_at_y..., "Ed Brey" <brey_at_a...> wrote:
> > I recently tried upgrading my project's library to use the latest
> > version of smart_ptr, and unfortunately, the pragmas that were
> added to
> > suppress a spurious warning are triggering an internal compiler
> error on
> > VC6.5. VC claims the line causing the problem is operator* in
> > shared_ptr.
> >
>
> The same goes for VC6.4.
>
> Markus

I thought this sounded familiar, and I finally got around to looking it
up. Check out Q120968 and the online documentation for pragma warning:

> For warning numbers greater than 4699, those associated with code generation, the warning pragma has effect only when placed outside function definitions. The pragma is ignored if it specifies a number greater than 4699 and is used inside a function.

This talks about function scope rather than class scope, but I bet you
could put them anywhere at file scope, not just at beginning and end.

Lois


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk