From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-17 17:59:05
At 04:23 PM 4/17/2001, Doug Gregor wrote:
>Perhaps the formal review of a library should be prefaced by a few days
>where other Boost members could try the library on several different
>compilers before the library actually comes up for formal review. At this
>point the library would be slushy - internals may need to be modified
>to make the code portable, but the interface should be unchanged.
>I believe this would make formal reviews go more smoothly, and allieviate
>the problem with libraries changing while they are being reviewed.
That makes sense to me! I'm not sure exactly how implement that approach,
but maybe when a submitter asks for a formal review he or she should
mention what compilers the submission is known to work with, and ask for
test results from others.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk