From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-26 20:34:14
From: Trevor Perrin <tperrin_at_[hidden]>
> I was wondering what the current thinking is on making the smart pointers
> threadsafe. Is it likely that Boost.Threads would be used for this purpose?
> If so (or if not), how efficient is a threadsafe implementation likely to
> be? I've noticed that gcc's basic_string is reference-counted and uses
> inlined assembly to access atomic instructions. Is that a strategy boost is
> likely to follow?
Yes, for those platforms that someone cares enough about to craft the
> To unsubscribe, send email to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk