From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-04-28 06:38:13
>However, after much investigation into the code, I don't believe that
>codeguard is correct. It's possible that the inlining in the header can
>cause problems: array nothrow new is an inlined call to nothrow new which
>an inlined call to malloc, but delete is *not* an inlined call to free.
>So there is no actual heap corruption with pool. But thanks for running
Yes you're right, if there is a bug, it's in Borland calling malloc
directly instead of via the regular new.
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk