Re: [boost] Problem indicating a template in "function_traits.hpp "

From: Doug Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-03 09:48:36

On Thursday 03 May 2001 10:33, you wrote:
> > > CodeWarrior must not do function template partial ordering.
> > > #define BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING
> > > for your compiler and try again.
> > >
> > > Doug
>
> From: "Chris Little" <cslittle_at_[hidden]>
>
> > That fixed it.  This define will have to be added to config.hpp.
>
> Well, that would be too penalizing. Intel, gcc and Metrowerks all do
> partial ordering well enough for most situations; the problem is that Doug
> uses a rather difficult construct that they can't handle properly.

Should I rename BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING to something that doesn't 
indicate no support, but instead indicates that the necessary level of 
compliance for boost::function isn't met? If config.hpp ever gets 
BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING, I'd hate for function.hpp to stomp on 
its definition.

        Doug