From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-04 07:28:24
From: "Jesse Jones" <jesjones_at_[hidden]>
> Hmm, I think I could live with that. It's important to make this as
> easy to use and as clean as possible though because it'll be used a
> lot. I looked at the bind.hpp that Peter pointed me to and it had a
> different (and to my eyes uglier) API.
Hm. bind.hpp that I posted to the list works like this:
which only differs by the version you want in the argument order. The
function object comes first for consistency (a member pointer is considered
a function object with an implicit 'this' as a first argument.)
What's uglier in this API?
The other bind usage is
used in situations like this:
// vector<CWidget> w;
// vector<CWidget*> w;
vector<shared_ptr<CWidget> > w;
for_each(w.begin(), w.end(), bind(&CWidget::DoRedraw));
[A generalization of mem_fun/mem_fun_ref]
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk