From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-15 16:38:13
At 03:10 PM 5/15/2001, Bill Seymour wrote:
>Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>> I think the ability of choosing rounding mode should not be
>> overlooked. It is an essential part of LIA-1 and later standards.
>and Beman Dawes responded:
>> I'm convinced.
>but I'm not sure that I am. I'm under the impression that LIA-1
>relates more to numeric programming than to accounting. If I
>hear from accountants that they care about multiple rounding
>modes, then I'll echo Beman's statement.
Seems like you need to post a query to an accountant's newsgroup to answer
that one! Boost isn't a likely hangout for the green eyeshade crowd:-)
One of the things to consider is whether or not adding a defaulted rounding
trait/policy template parameter (or a runtime one per Howard's comment)
really messes up the interface.
In the end, it isn't design by committee. You will have heard a lot of
opinions, but you are the one who has to make the final decision. Good
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk