From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-24 12:28:30
----- Original Message -----
From: "Vesa Karvonen" <vesa.karvonen_at_[hidden]>
> In summary, IMO the benefit of having a simple and robust implementation
> static assertion clearly outweighs the benefit of having a verbose but
> brittle static assertion. Now that the boost static assertion has been
> not to work in some situations, I think that research on this should be
> primarily targeted on finding an implementation that works on as many
> compilers as possible.
Very well put! I agree with these priorities.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk