From: joel de guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-25 08:47:46
From: "Larry Evans" :
> > I'd like to propose changing >> to +, keeping the prefix +, * and adding
> > an iterator.
> What about & and rename the current & to &&?
If we change & to &&. we have to change | to ||
but the other set-like ops have no double op
counterpart ^ ? - ?.
I guess not. The & op is set intersection (which also
applies to bit and: set intersection of the bits)
The && op is logical and.
Joel de Guzman
PS> I like your other suggestion re: iterator.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk