From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-25 09:06:02
I like ten days. It just feels right. I assume that in 7 days interested
people will miss the opportunity to comment due to vacations, etc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>; <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: PREPROCESSOR
> At 09:08 AM 5/25/2001, Vesa Karvonen wrote:
> >I'm requesting a formal review of the PREPROCESSOR library. The library
> >package "preprocessor_20010525.zip" is in Files/PREPROCESSOR.
> Thanks! It is on the list to follow the Tuples review, scheduled to end
> June 26.
> What do people think of the ten day review periods versus the seven day
> review periods? Any strong preferences?
> To unsubscribe, send email to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk