From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-26 14:14:57
From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> On first sight I'd say Peter may have uncovered a defect in the standard.
> don't think we meant to say that about std::less<>.
That depends. The problem is that std::less is 'overloaded' to mean two
things: 1) operator< and 2) the default ordering policy for associatives.
These two roles should, IMHO, be separated.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk