From: joel de guzman (isis-tech_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-29 22:04:20
From: "Toon Knapen" <:
> I'm following the Spirit discussion a bit since I'm not specialised in
> parsers but am looking for using it good one nevertheless. But also the
> review of the Tokenizer drew my attention and since I think we should
> have no (minimal) redundancy I was wondering if it would be possible to
> unify the tokenizer being in review and the one used in the Spirit
> parser. If Spirit will be boostified some day this redundancy has to be
> tackled anyway.
Thanks, I'll look into that.,
> AFAIK this issue was not raised yet, nevertheless I mailed this to you
> personally to minimise redundancy on the ml. If this issue was not
> raised yet, you can of course reply via the ml.
Joel de Guzman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk