Re: [boost] Review results: Special functions, Quaternions, Octonions

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-05-30 15:45:56

At 05:59 PM 5/29/2001, Jens Maurer wrote:

 > - We must solve the subdirectory and sub-namespace issue sooner
 >or later, but not necessarily during this review.  (I'm happy
 >with boost/math/. "special_functions" has a well-defined meaning
 >therein, I believe.)  While moving around things later is quite a
 >pain, I feel that these issues should not prevent the integration
 >of the current library.

Agreed.  boost/math is fine with me.  We'll worry later about which (if 
any) other stuff should be moved there.

--Beman