From: AlisdairM (AlisdairM_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-03 17:05:34
I firmly believe "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" and repeated use of
shared_ptr has proven it stable for our needs.
Yet every time I read about pool/small object allocators, the reference
count of the shared_ptr libraries screams out as a classic example, if an
int is not a small object, what is?!
Is there any reason not to investigate this for boost? Or has this already
been evaluated and rejected?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk