From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-04 06:46:39
----- Original Message -----
From: "Daryle Walker" <darylew_at_[hidden]>
> > But how about asking the list as a whole for options? I'm backed up
> > requests to look at stuff, I'm afraid.
> The test file would need suggestions more than the new class templates. I
> was looking for simple approval/rejection, but the things I offer that
> simple have ended up with a lot of new input on this list, though.
I'm not looking forward to having the onus on me to approve/reject another
set of library changes. Daryle should repackage his changes as a separate
library and submit them for formal review. If the group approves it AND the
consensus is that it should be part of the utility library, then we can fold
it back in.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk