Re: [boost] Re: Problem with iterator adaptor lib and concepts

From: Jeremy Siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-08 08:25:53

On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Daryle Walker wrote:

> on 6/7/01 6:01 PM, Jeremy Siek at jsiek_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
> > Let me know what you think of this proposal:
> >
> > http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2001/n1297.html

The above proposal is the more recent. I decided to drop the one-pass
traversal category. The rationale is in the paper, but to summarize, I
thought it would be better to keep the InputIterator category as is.

> on 6/7/01 6:07 PM, David Abrahams at abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
> > Jeremy has worked out a proposed new set of iterator concepts
> > (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/iterator_concepts.zip). I think
> > it makes sense to modify iterator_adaptor to support them. Someone with a
> > need (like you) would be a perfect candidate to begin that work. For what
> > it's worth, I anticipate running up against many of the same issues very
> > soon in work on the boost matrix effort.
> [TRUNCATE]
>
> I noticed that these proposals are slightly different.  One thing the first
> one is missing from the second is the concept of an one-pass traversal
> iterator concept.  Which paper was done first?
>
> --
> Daryle Walker
> Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie
> darylew AT mac DOT com
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send email to: <mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jeremy Siek                        www: http://www.lsc.nd.edu/~jsiek/
 Ph.D. Candidate, IU B'ton          email: jsiek_at_[hidden]
 Summer Manager, AT&T Research      phone: [phone]
----------------------------------------------------------------------