RE: [boost] Review: Function library

From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-13 13:03:49

> 3) In the absence of a bind library it seems silly to force everyone
> to generate their own copies of the bind code in the FAQ. I would
> imagine that nearly everyone who uses boost::function is going to
> need to work with methods so I think their should be a stopgap
> solution inside boost.

Anybody working on this? If not, I'll come up with something simple.

Yes, LL is in the works, but its slow going as usual. We are at least a
month or two away from submission.

There are at least 3 options here:
std binders

Peter Dimov's bind, (There is a copy in the vault)
LL (http://lambda.cs.utu.fi)

  -gary-

gary.powell_at_[hidden]