Re: Stronger exception safety guarantee for smart_ptr.res et()

From: williamkempf_at_[hidden]
Date: 2001-06-19 13:53:21

--- In boost_at_y..., "Vesa Karvonen" <vesa.karvonen_at_h...> wrote:
> Perhaps someone has invented a better mechanism for dealing
> with (legacy) objects that might throw in their destructors.

I don't think it's much of an issue, frankly.  Most legacy objects 
will be using legacy libraries which don't throw, thus they need no 
special attention.  If there is a potential for an exception to be 
thrown, however, whether the code is legacy or not is irrelevant to 
me... it needs to be fixed.

Just my .02 worth.

Bill Kempf