From: Kostya Altukhov (kostya_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-23 07:53:44
Beman Dawes wrote:
> >bind(f, _1, _2);
> >one-based indexing is much more intuitive.
>My memory of past discussions in the C++ committee was a strong preference
>for consistent 0 based indexing even in the cases where it is less
Why than std::pair has 'first' and 'second' instead of 'nullth' and 'first'
(and why tuple of two variables should use different scheme than std::pair)?
Why do we have std::bind1st and std::bind2nd instead of std::bind0th
and std::bind1st (and I think when we use tuples for binding,
the scheme should be consistent with standard binders)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk