From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-24 05:48:22
>Is there any chance of getting rid of 'explicit' on the
>default constructor for reg_expression?
I don't think that should be a problem - the explicit part only stops you
from implicitly converting an allocator to a regex (something you probably
didn't what - an allocator is not a regex) - regexes are still default
constructible, "as if" the explicit were not there:
is just fine.
- John Maddock
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk