Re: [boost] Review Manager assignment

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-26 11:11:25

Sounds good!
-Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost.org mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:16 AM
Subject: [boost] Review Manager assignment

> The process we are using to assign review managers is too cumbersome.  It
> involves posting a request on the list, and then dealing with responses or
> lack of them.  Furthermore, I'm a bottleneck; if I'm not available or
> distracted, things don't happen in a timely manner.
>
> How about this for a new approach:
>
> We build up a list of people will to be review managers, and simply rotate
> through the list in order.  Adjust as necessary if someone is unavailable
> or doesn't want to do a particular lib.  The list can stay in CVS so it is
> available for inspection.
>
> If we have 8 or 10 people on the list, that ensures that the workload and
> responsibility get spread out reasonably.
>
> Comments?  Volunteers?
>
> --Beman
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>