Re: [boost] Re: Boost.Threads - thread_desc concept

From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 17:15:41

From: John Max Skaller <skaller_at_[hidden]>
> williamkempf_at_[hidden] wrote:
> 
> > Considering all of the discussion so far, I think this slightly
> > modified interface is the best design so far:
> > 
> >     class thread : boost::noncopyable
> >     {
> 
> What? only one kind of thread allowed?
> Shouldn't this class use pure virtual methods?

I think the answer is that this class is not intended as
a base class, which is one reason some of us prefer that
it be just a namespace.