Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-28 20:04:08

At 06:47 PM 6/28/2001, David Abrahams wrote:

>I think we need to think carefully about library issues 225 and 229 when
>proceeding down the path of defining generalized free math functions.

I'm sorry, maybe it is too close to bedtime, but I couldn't relate your
discussion, interesting though it was, to Hubert's namespace proposal.

Or was it more a case of a train of thought that got kicked off by his
proposal, but doesn't actually bear on whether or not we should have a
namespace boost::math with sub-namespace boost::math::special_functions?

Confused in Virginia,


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at