Re: [boost] Suggested coding guidelines

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-29 20:59:20

Just for uniqueness, that's all. Isn't the rationale in the document? It
should be.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Colvin" <gcolvin_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Suggested coding guidelines

> From: Greg Chicares <chicares_at_[hidden]>
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> > >
> > > See
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/boost-coding-standard.html
> > >
> > > These are the standards I use at work. I posted these since a few
people
> > > expressed interest.
> ...
> >
> > | 1.2 #ifndef RECTANGLE_DWA050499_HPP_
> >
> > Could I persuade you to use ISO8601 dates instead? I have to think
> > about whether this means
> >   RECTANGLE_DWA19990504_HPP_
> > or
> >   RECTANGLE_DWA19990405_HPP_
>
> Why the initials and date at all?
>
>
> Info: http://www.boost.org  Unsubscribe:
<mailto:boost-unsubscribe_at_[hidden]>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>