From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 12:27:22
OK, it's a simple misunderstanding. boost::make_counting_iterator() is a
make_* function that wouldn't be obsoleted, that's all.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> I didn't say anything about object generators in general. :-) Only that I
> don't see any benefit in requiring 'std::make_pair(1, 2)' instead of
> allowing 'std::pair(1, 2)'.
> I spell the type in both cases, so this particular kind of object
> is redundant.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk