RE: [boost] Review Manager assignment

From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 14:13:42

Beman Dawes wrote:
> The process we are using to assign review managers is too 
> cumbersome.  It involves posting a request on the list, and 
> then dealing with responses or lack of them.  Furthermore, 
> I'm a bottleneck; if I'm not available or distracted, things 
> don't happen in a timely manner.
> 
> How about this for a new approach:
> 
> We build up a list of people will to be review managers, and 
> simply rotate through the list in order.  Adjust as necessary 
> if someone is unavailable or doesn't want to do a particular lib.  

Or if it's his library that is being reviewed :).

> The list can stay in CVS so it is available for inspection.
> 
> If we have 8 or 10 people on the list, that ensures that the 
> workload and responsibility get spread out reasonably.
> 
> Comments?  

Sounds good to me too. 

> Volunteers?

Sure :)

Aleksey