From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-06-30 14:13:42
Beman Dawes wrote:
> The process we are using to assign review managers is too
> cumbersome. It involves posting a request on the list, and
> then dealing with responses or lack of them. Furthermore,
> I'm a bottleneck; if I'm not available or distracted, things
> don't happen in a timely manner.
> How about this for a new approach:
> We build up a list of people will to be review managers, and
> simply rotate through the list in order. Adjust as necessary
> if someone is unavailable or doesn't want to do a particular lib.
Or if it's his library that is being reviewed :).
> The list can stay in CVS so it is available for inspection.
> If we have 8 or 10 people on the list, that ensures that the
> workload and responsibility get spread out reasonably.
Sounds good to me too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk