Re: [jamming] RFC: On the future of Jam, "FT Jam" and Boost

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-01 07:54:20

> > 2. I think I'd like to keep the boost identity attached to the
> > architecture somehow.
>
> Please explain.

The low-level build system is Jam -> FTJam -> whatever you want to call it.
The high-level part written in the (FT)Jam language is what I've been
calling the Boost Build System. I would like to maintain that association
with boost.

-Dave