From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-01 11:36:37
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
> Inventing a new syntax isn't inherently a bad thing. It's simply that I
> that a collection of libraries that is aiming to become part of the
> library has to maintain consistency. Different authors will have different
> pet languages and favor different syntax.
> The 2^n explosion is not a problem here, I believe. Rarely does printing a
> thing change that thing. :-)
I agree that it's not significant. But now combine that with the limitation
in number of arguments... even printf can handle an arbitrary number. It
would be a shame if the C++ version were less-capable in any way.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk