From: Samuel Krempp (krempp_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-01 13:19:18
> >Is it a (different) problem that dollar-sign is not part
> >of the language's basic source character set (2.2/1) ?
> >If that character is unavailable on, say, an Icelandic
> >keyboard, then there's no trigraph for it either.
> Ouch! Good catch, Greg.
Reading this paragraph of the norm,
I guess the 'Universal character' system could make it possible to use a
'$' on such a keyboard.
really, do you believe there will ever be a platform where it is not
possible to type '$' ?
> > Would
> >a library that needs dollar-sign be acceptable in ISO C++?
> I doubt it.
> IMO, we need to stick to the basic character set.
for this, I replaced $ by # in some parts of the syntax.
currently, to use printf-like direcives, you still need $ to make
positional directives ( %5$x == 5-th argument in hexa )
this makes another point to consider for the final design of the syntax.
I havnt fixed my opinion yet, but the current state is nearly
Maybe we can extend the short-style notation so that usual people dont
ever need to use printf-like directives.
anyway, it's not a crucial design issue.
The parsing code can be modified with little impact on the rest.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk