From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-05 10:02:14
----- Original Message -----
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> Anyhow, we should probably globally change to #include "..."
> That is the correct form for all non-standard library includes, and Boost
> should be using it.
Where do you get your definition of "correct" in this case?
I am just wondering, because the issue is far from clear to me. Peter Dimov
and Toon Knapen made some good arguments for <>.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk