From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-07-05 14:33:59
----- Original Message -----
From: "Toon Knapen" <toon_at_[hidden]>
> That much of existing code would have to be adapted is not a real
> argument is it. Your intention is to define well engineered guidelines
> to be used in the future. Don't blur your design with the past.
> Certainly in this case where you just have to spend a day max to convert
> to the new guidelines.
It's one thing to impose a "one day burden" on the library maintainers, but
quite another to do it to our users.
I do like distinguishing types from the rest, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk